Just like anytime you disrupt a well established market ( like public transport in france), with arbitrary decisions based solely on politic games.
Interfering in a market and destroying an economical activity requires proof. Simply claiming "it's good for the environment" isn't enough.
It's a purely symbolic gesture, and has 0 impact on climate.
Just like anytime you disrupt a well established market ( like public transport in france), with arbitrary decisions based solely on politic games.