Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What you describe is a matter of willpower. I would bet one could modularize a modern iPhone to previous levels of repairability with only 10% to 20% more space. But Apple wants those repair dollars...


Which means either a smaller battery or a thicker phone. I don't want either of those things.


Nearly every iPhone I see is wrapped in a case to protect it (i.e. making it thicker).

The current iPhone 7 is 7.3mm thick. An additional 10% would mean 8mm. It's not a razor -- you don't need to shave with it.


> Nearly every iPhone I see is wrapped in a case to protect it (i.e. making it thicker).

Some of those cases take you more than halfway towards 80s-carphone size...


And thus we can't have useful things...


> What you describe is a matter of willpower.

> ...only 10% to 20% more space.

So not a matter of willpower then?


Willpower drives everything... but there's less money in modularity so Apple doesn't have it


If by making use of your "willpower" other things fall out of your control, then is not just a matter of willpower.

By making it modular you are sacrificing size, there are no two ways around it. The discussion gets nowhere if people keep claiming the same exact product can be built if you just try hard enough.


No, look, 10-20% bigger is a real tradeoff. It's not about willpower, it's about what tradeoffs matter to you. Apple doesn't want their phones bigger. They very clearly care about how thin and light everything they make is. And I can mock it all I want to (I don't own a single Apple product, because I really don't share those values), but given that they are incredibly successful at what they do I don't think it's obvious that consumers don't care about these things. You can argue this preference all you want, but until you admit _it even exists_ you aren't going to be able to have a useful conversation on the matter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: