Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | HPsquared's commentslogin

I usually do the "drip feed" with ChatGPT, but maybe that's not optimal. Hmm, maybe info dump is a good thing to try.

There a recent(ish: May 2025) paper about how drip-feeding information is worse than restarting with a revised prompt once you realize details are missing.[0]

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120


There are plenty of LLM services that have a conversational style. The paragraph blocks thing is just a style.

I'd never thought about it in this way before but the idea of writing a number as a decimal (or other) string of numerals, bears some resemblance to a Fourier transform.

Think of the components of a written number: ones, tens, hundreds etc which have a repeating pattern. Digits are inherently periodic. Not too far from periodic basis functions.

Both involve breaking something down into periodic components, and reversing the process by adding up the components.


Clever, but only really appropriate for the most significant digit.

The one's digit gives info about parity (odd/even), but nothing else.


It's kind of cheating, but I wonder if you could set up some kind of "server side rendering proxy" that would run all the JS on a given page, and send the client a plain html page with hyperlinks in place of interactive JS elements.

Edit: https://www.brow.sh/


Opera Mini's "extreme mode" takes this approach. The server pre-renders content, also stripping out things the client doesn't need or that would require a lot of resources/bandwidth.

Note that this does present a bit of a man-in-the-middle scenario, and Opera's chief income is from advertising (and "query").


Just use Dillo. It's something has videos, use mpv+yt-dlp.

~/.config/mpv/config:

    #start
    ytdl-format=bestvideo[height<=?480][fps<=?30]+bestaudio/best
    ao=sndio
    vo=gpu,xv
    audio-pitch-correction=no
    quiet=yes
    pause=no
    profile=fast
    vd-lavc-skiploopfilter=all
    #demuxer-cache-wait=yes
    #demuxer-max-bytes=4MiB
    #end
~/yt-dlp.conf

    #start
    --format=bestvideo[height<=?480][fps<=?30]+bestaudio/best
    #end

That's a wonderful idea! Thank you!

Would that work with CORS?

I wonder how much the jeans would cost if the price of shipping (i.e. the cost per container ocean mile) were to double.

I searched a little bit and found these numbers for t-shirts in a 20 foot container:

- Shipping container from China to the US: $3000-$9000 (tariffs?)

- Number of t-shirts per container: 35000

How much heavier are jeans than t-shirts? 10 times? That would mean an increase of $2.50 if container shipping costs double.


I think the volume is what defines the cost for cargo shipping so your 10x is likely pessimistic. $2.50 is both significant relative to the price of one these jeans and not much compared to what has been the expected cost of a pair for decades.

It says more about how dirt cheap shipping is the single enabler of globalization, even doubling the cost may not be enough to significantly shorten the supply chains.


Somewhat different, but this reminds me of an approach that uses temperature gradients in the ocean to power a heat engine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_thermal_energy_conversio...


OTECs are amazing, and step 1 of "The Millennial Project: Colonizing the galaxy in eight easy steps"[0]

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Millennial_Project

There's a shore-based research OTEC in Hawaii, but the best is a floating, closed-loop OTEC in the ocean.


Interesting link. I would think step 7 would come before step 6 though. I thought about this for a few minutes and can't come with a reason otherwise.

The timelines are increasing powers of 2. It’ll take much longer to colonize all asteroids than to settle Mars.

wiki article states "Up to 10,000 TWh/yr of power could be generated from OTEC without affecting the ocean's thermal structure". which converts to about 500GW which... isn't that much

10 000 TWh/yr is one third of the current total electric energy generation of the whole planet, is not a small amount.

Source, page 39 of the full report:

https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025/electr...


This can't be correct.

10,000 TWh/y = 1e+7 GWh/y, divide it by 365.25 days/y to produce daily output of 27,379 GWh/day, then by 24 h/day to get pure power of 1,141 GW. It's still more than a terawatt, three orders of magnitude larger than the largest nuclear reactors.


oops. yes. still not that much though. i mean it's a lot but it's "one more large industrialized country" a lot not "kardashev 2" a lot

Kardashev 2 has a Dyson sphere. Of course anything on a single planet can never have that much.

Those goalposts of yours are on a FTL ship...

Wikipedia calls this citogenesis.

Maybe there could be a system to classify the importance of each reference.

Systems do exist for this, but they're rather crude.

The business world learned from their mistake.

The internet is turning society into a kind of "social emulsion" where everyone is their own little droplet in the fluid, but they don't merge together.

It's not "the internet". It is "this internet".

Back in the 90s early 00s the internet made us mesh together because each one of us there was a specific person. We had forum signatures and every single post was clearly made by a person, for a person.

Then social media took over and relegated every single person into a tiny unidentifiable avatar next to a non-prominent name, not unlike NPCs in CRPGs.

In turn this has been exploited by the powers that be to ensure the social glue gets even weaker: a society barely held together won't revolt. There's only one thing left to do: productivity, productivity, productivity.

The political opponent is no longer a person. Just a nameless, faceless NPC (personifying everything that's wrong) spawned there to be defeated and collect their social loot tokens.

But I might just be an old fart rambling about the good, old days.


Maybe the issue is this perception that "the Internet" consists mainly of the big 4 social media sites.

Go on Discord. People have usernames, avatars. Discord Profile Bios are just as unique as forum signatures.


I am on Discord and the balkanization+homogeneization is still as prominent there as everywhere else.

Server admins are just NPCs providing @everyone announcements from time to time, to keep the player engaged (spoiler: the average Joe is just irritated by those). Sometimes you get a quest from them.

Also: 99% won't read profile bios (and you have to pay for actual customization, don't you?) while forum signatures were front-and-center.

I have to say I'm surprised to see Discord mentioned as an opposite to social media instead of... just yet another iteration of the same ploy.


> Server admins are just NPCs providing @everyone announcements from time to time, to keep the player engaged. Sometimes you get a quest from them.

Maybe you should join better servers. I'll also add that this was common back in the forum days too. Most admins would just... admin the site.

> Also: 99% won't read profile bios (and you have to pay for actual customization, don't you?) while forum signatures were front-and-center.

Wrong on both counts.

> I have to say I'm surprised to see Discord mentioned as an opposite to social media instead of... just yet another iteration of the same.

I did not present it as an "opposite to social media" - I presented it as a counter to the idea that we've lost the personality GP is talking about


You're one of the 1% who reads profile bios.

Of course, because the alternative - that they're wrong, and more people actually do read bios - couldn't possibly be true.

In any case, I see no reason to believe any higher % of people paid any particular attention to forum signatures back in the day.


“Paid attention”, you're probably right. Seen them enough to remember? Forum signatures were far harder to miss than Discord bios.

Discord also is a centralized piece of proprietary totalitarianism. No thanks.

Fuck discord. Another big for-profit platform that is swallowing big chunks of the internet. before discord there were lots of self-organized forums with their own communities and rules. Now I need to register with some big overlord and download their shitty app just to read what has before been just an URL away?

Nah. Right in the browser works great: discord.com/app

You’re going to keep running into a wall thinking of discord like a forum replacement; It’s designed to be an IRC replacement.

The invitation system intentionally creates some privacy so you can build a sense of enclosed community around them, and so you have some control over who sees what. Not having your conversations on full automatic blast to the public is a feature.


IRC works in the browser now thanks to IRCv3. Matrix is another option

The invitation system gives a false sense of privacy. There are bots that crawl publicly posted invites, public IRC channels, etc. Eventually people will understand that IRC and discord are public in the same way we understand usenet to have been public


> before discord there were lots of self-organized forums with their own communities and rules.

And running them was awful and drove the people who did it insane, mostly because you had to fight spambots.


Yeah, sadly it is the spambots which have killed off independent platforms more than anything else. It sounds like something which could easily give rise to conspiracy theories from people putting the spammers into the same mental baskets as the controlling companies. It isn't the expense of having to leave on a raspberry pi running a server.

But you can enjoy it before enshittification arrives!

All praise our VC overlords.


back in the 90's a minority of people were on the internet in the first place. it predates eternal september.

The internet is now dominated by the opinion of the lowest common denominator, so we find ourselves holed up on forums like this.


I wouldn't say Internet is a problem, but centralisation towards big tech algos and clearly gamed social media comment sections do control the narrative of what the majority of people see most of the time.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: