Right, but if you say people "use" something, it's disingenous (for a scientific... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		dekhn on July 18, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: 50 years of Fortran at CERN (2007) Right, but if you say people "use" something, it's disingenous (for a scientific paper) to imply that implementation details don't matter. Had I written the paper (I'm a scientist, I work with astro data sets at times, and manage Python wrappers for Fortran and C++ libraries) I would have calculated this based on instructions executed, not lines of user-facing code. After all, if the code the astro people called was Pure Python, they wouldn't use python, as it would be too slow.

agumonkey on July 18, 2015 [–]

Reminds me of the 'made in X' fallacy.

  #!/usr/bin/env python
  from subprocess import Popen
  Popen("/usr/bin/some-fortran-binary")
  print("Once again python saves the day.")

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact