Racism, sexism and politics play a far smaller role than you might imagine. It's a matter of skills, for example, in 2001 there were more than 16,000 Asian Americans who scored more than 700 on the math SAT. While there was less than 700 black Americans who scored more than 700 on the math SAT.
So sure, in aggregate black males earn less than asian American males and white Americans (asian Americans also earn more on average than white Americans, are whites being discriminated against?), but if you compare apples to apples (similar education, experience, test scores, etc) then there is virtually no gap.
The dogma is that statistical disparities demonstrate some form of discrimination, this assumes that there is an equality of performance which is virtually impossible to find in the real world.
> (asian Americans also earn more on average than white Americans, are whites being discriminated against?)
Really? Seems like an unnecessary thing to say.
If you take a closer look at the numbers, this isn't really the case. Asian households are larger, so median incomes are larger, and Asian-Americans tend to live in about 5 states, which have on average higher costs of living (and as a result higher median incomes).
If we're looking at SAT scores: in 2013, about 50,000 white students scored 700 or above in the math SAT, as did about 49,000 Asian students. Google's statistics at http://www.google.com/diversity/ indicate they have about twice as many white employees as Asian employees overall, and about three times as many in leadership. What gives?
You can say that 650+ math SAT score is more realistica assesment of average Google talent. There are 78400 Asians with 650+ score and 133440 whites with 650+ score in math. There are only 4200 blacks with 650+ score. Numbers pretty much align with Google diversity report.
> but if you compare apples to apples (similar education, experience, test scores, etc) then there is virtually no gap
Wasn't there literally a recent study that sent the same resume to employers and only changed the name and the white names got significantly more attention than stereotypically black names?
