Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It should be simple to develop a predictive model of programmer effectiveness. We can measure the number of lines of codes, number of defects committed, number of defects fixed, etc. against the average developer on the average software project and then we have a way of approximately evaluating a programmer's contributions to a software project.

Science is really hard.



See, the thing is, people are already trying really hard to do that. Practicing programmers, even.


And it's hard to do that even when the desired outcome is just good code.

Now try and do it when the desired outcome is good people (education).


Good point. Would you agree that: even if a phenomenon (for example performance of some sort of worker) is hard to model, we should still try, especially if that phenomenon provides enormous value to society?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: