Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, but an explicit apology forces a benchmark of accountability: if the government apologized to group A for committing B, why are they still committing B to group C?


"forces"? You clearly don't have much experience with groups of monkeys.

Some of the known-successful ways to get around said "benchmark" are "this time it's different", "this government is good", "group C deserves it", and "we're not doing B".


Yeah, but it's still much worse if the official climate is that it's "acceptable". It can always be worse, you know.


> Yeah, but it's still much worse if the official climate is that it's "acceptable".

How about some supporting evidence?

> It can always be worse, you know.

Yes, it can always be worse, but whether or not a govt has said something is wrong has no predictive power on that issue.

Every post-1900 by-govt mass murder was committed by a "we don't do those things" regime.


I personally think its unlikely that an apology to Turing will change many attitudes to homosexuality or encourage a (lasting) crack down on discrimination.


True, it will just mean that homosexuals won't be treated to required mind-altering drugs (not the good stuff) and barred from working.


What countries require homosexuals to be treated with mind altering drugs? Iran actually goes beyond chemical castration with required physical sex changes: it is illegal to be gay, but it is legal to be transexual. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Iran




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: