Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The primary burden is the one stating the original argument. It is also somewhat questionable to ask someone to prove a negative.


considering that 3 is 50% more than 2, I'd say the negative is that it ISN'T a "huge" improvement.

(only a little kidding).


It is also somewhat questionable to ask someone to prove a negative.

This isn't true at all. The negative is also often seen in the form of a null hypothesis. "There's someone in the fridge". "No, there isn't". Here is a case where we can prove a negative. Some negatives by their nature can't be proven, but as a blanket statement it's false.

You yourself mentioned that benchmarks were worse - this is proof of the negative, and you could have cited those benchmarks in your argument.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: