Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Shouldn't we teach the basics to a degree that everyone is passing those instead of wasting money at that level? And I do think it would be a waste.


> Shouldn't we teach the basics to a degree that everyone is passing those instead of wasting money at that level?

I don't think "teach the basics to a a degree that everyone is passing" and "wasting money" are a fair description of the relevant options.


You have a very utilitarian view of education that I find uncomfortably limiting.

My own view is that rather than worrying about children 'passing' some arbitrary standardised test. We should be aiming at teaching children to think critically and have a large intellectual toolbox to work from.

Of course; I'm weird in that I think children should be introduced to as many concepts as possible as early as possible and that the principles underlying calculus and differential equations are exactly the sort of thing that a bright 7 year old might find engaging intellectual toys. I also think that education is a lifelong process and needs to include both regimented group learning and self-guided exploration.


Isn't the challenge of education-planning how to compel students, not how to agree that we need to?

Perhaps exposing children to more novelty and creative outlets presents more opportunities to hook their interest.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: