Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why does it have to shut down, cant they just not release new versions?


I would guess that there will be some sort of re-branding/re-launch of something since the message refers primarily to the winamp.com domain. Someone may have purchased the domain or AOL may do something new with it.


Because no one wants to pay to keep it up?


I'd pitch in towards the $20 a year for the domain + vps.


Will you also indemnify AOL against all third party claims should someone use the software, it messes up their Windows 9.3 filesystem, and they end up suing... however meritless the case may be? Will you accept responsibility for acting as the DMCA contact and updating the site within the time limits provided in the Safe Harbor provisions should a skin, plugin, or visualization infringe someone else's copyright? Will you also update the apps for free to keep current with mobile and desktop OS changes?

I'm guessing AOL has looked at all this and sees $$$ for both the business risk as well as maintaining software which they have deemed does nothing for their company goals. As a result, they are better off focusing their limited resources towards efforts which do further their goals.


This is why I really, really hate the modern, diversified corporation.

The decision of whether to continue a product line within a large corporation is very, very different from whether or not a product line could keep a small business afloat. If you're a small business, the only question is "are we making payroll?". Within a large, diversified corporation, you have to ask if a project is as valuable as your alternatives. Mom-and-pop's with a sustainable business can't and don't say, "Yeah, this is profitable, but it'd be more profitable if we dropped everything we're doing and put our resources towards a different sector entirely." But it's entirely feasible and rational for a large corporation to look at it's hundred sub-businesses, axe the ten least profitable, and put the people to work on the ten most profitable.

I'd be a lot happier if modern corporations were small, narrowly focused beasts, and not the monstrous conglomerations we have instead.


Would open sourcing the code get around that?


Pitch in to archive all of their releases or a donation to Archive Team[1] to archive all of their releases.

[1] http://www.archiveteam.org/


Already finishing up pulling the whole site into a warc/cdx and getting it to textfiles.com (aka ArchiveTeam).


Guess I'm slow. I'm halfway through recursively fetching download.nullsoft.com/winamp/ with the intention of seeding a new torrent on TPB. Is that what you grabbed?


No, grabbed *.winamp.com/winamp.com (full grab I'll send off to be added to archive.org).


it's better to just let it die, unless they open source it. helping people find and use unmaintained software is a terrible idea.


It's better to archive software (well, everything!), regardless of what it is. Helping people find and use archived historical software is a wonderful idea.

This comment is brought to you by https://archive.org/details/software


Just give it a year and you might be able to...

    Domain Name.......... winamp.com
      Creation Date........ 1997-12-30
      Registration Date.... 2009-10-03
      Expiry Date.......... 2014-12-24


No he won't. All expired domains are immediately parked by the registrar. Parked domains are much more expensive than free domains.


seems weird that would be a problem for AOL.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: