Maybe I'm being overly pedantic here, but if you're going to call out a project like systemd that is headed in the direction of being the de facto standard in all the other serious Linux distributions, you probably should have looked at the project closely enough to have seen the big deal they make of the correct spelling on their homepage (i.e. systemd vs SystemD). Actually, I'm definitely being overly pedantic here, but his completely dismissive attitude towards systemd makes this KWin post make a bit more sense. Certainly sways me in the direction of agreeing.
No I get that, and I'm not it's biggest fan either, but it's a pretty core component to take the decision lightly. Most of the arguments I see against systemd are very well informed and well reasoned. That's why I categorized his as "dismissive" - and it seems consistent with the accusation that he isn't reasonable, but just doesn't like people disagreeing with him.
