Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's funny. I was thinking of exactly the same thing. Another thing to do is limit how much email is kept, so old mail is automatically purged.


I suspect lots of people are considering these kinds of designs these days. :) There's been some discussion on various mailing lists, usually assinine, but once in a while clever folk join in.

> Another thing to do is limit how much email is kept, so old mail is automatically purged.

Makes sense.

I'm also not sure how easy it would be to provide an option for the user to choose, for example, whether to accept incoming mail over a plaintext channel. SMTP TLS handshake takes place immediately after the initial "hello". Ideally there could be two servers listening (the user would have to decide which server to use, each of which would imply a different email suffix), one with a forced TLS mode, and each user could choose which mode to use. Maybe I'm overthinking things over a problem that is unsolvable in the framework of the email protocol (which does suck in this regard).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: