Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The earth is struggling to sustain the population as it is. Older people tend to require more resources for support, putting further strain on society. This is happening already in many developed countries as baby boomers enter retirement.

EDIT: PS. Thank you for not downvoting me. It's refreshing to see a difference of opinion without the vitriol



This is about making older people require fewer resources for support. The holy grail of longevity research is increased lifespan with no appreciable decline in quality of life.

The main factors that contribute to a decreased quality of life are the same ones that eventually kill us. Namely, heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and the general cognitive/motor decline that comes with aging. If we could effectively halt senescence, we'd be able to expend fewer resources on care for the elderly.


This is turning into thread soup. But for arguments sake; Surely someone with low-grade aging symptoms living an additional 30 years is going to be a greater burden on society than someone dying from complications 30 years earlier?


Are you aware that your argument also supports eugenics, sterlization of geneticaly sick people, etc?

I'd say that burden isn't as much for the whole society, as for the family of each person and for that person. And it should be the decision of person (and maybe its family, but there's controversy there) if that person wants to live longer causing this burden.

I don't think state or science should decide on such things. And it's better to at least have a choice.


>Are you aware that your argument also supports eugenics, sterlization of geneticaly sick people, etc?

No. That is hyperbole in the extreme. I'm not talking about killing people once they reach 100. Take it down a notch.

The article discusses gene therapy to change animal biology to artificially extend lifespan before the complications of age present themselves, ie. in the middle of the animals life, not after the animal has aged. I'm questioning the societal benefits of this to humans.


Maybe the problem could be solved simply delaying retirement age. In some countries we've done it for other, less exciting, reasons.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: