This is such a Boomer way of looking at this. First of all, hardly anyone pays that much. Secondly, the more correct way of viewing such a situation is that you make a shitload of money.
2. Do you think an ageist ad hominem improves your argument?
3. What even is your argument? That in this contrived hypothetical the person in question is making a “shitload” and that somehow invalidates that 20% of EVERY tax dollar collected is used to just pay interest on debt (not even principal, just interest)
