"With the internet it would be easier than ever for OWS to get their message out, but they're not."
Really? You honestly believe they're not? How?
There are hundreds of occupy websites, hundreds of Twitter accounts (some with tens or hundreds of thousands of followers), facebook pages and groups (again with tens or hundreds of thousands of followers). There are online radio shows, there are hundreds of livestreams, printed newsletters, wheatpasting, banner drops, overpass light brigades, thousands of different posters, and more. What would convince you that occupy is trying to get their message out? What tactic aren't they using that would make you take the effort seriously? Or are you speaking based on something other than a sincere assessment of the movement?
Which idea? That it's easier than ever to get a message out? Or that OWS is failing to do so?
The person I replied to said, "You've been misinformed, on all fronts..." and then made a bunch of claims that OWS is doing stuff, but didn't provide any references to back it up. Supposedly, "OWS changed the political landscape in pretty dramatic ways, and continues to do so (and to deny that is to deny reality)." I'll stop denying it when I see evidence of it.
The Google News results I linked to contain plenty of examples of Occupy getting its message out and doing things. This thread is based on a story about Occupy doing a thing and getting its message out.
With the internet it would be easier than ever for OWS to get their message out, but they're not.
You can't protest the rich and then turn around and expect them to promote you on their TV stations.