Err, this is true in almost all "civilized" legal systems.
Judges everywhere are always responsible for determining if you are compliant with their orders, and holding you accountable if not.
Not everything is appealable.
In every justice system, there is always someone who is "always right because they are last", not "last because they are always right".
For example, in the US, the supreme court judges also act as the highest individual judge in a given circuit court. This usually comes into play with stays of death penalty cases.
The judges usually refer the petition to the full court, and the full court takes a vote. However, this is not required. The judge could simply deny/accept it.
You would have no way to appeal this.
Judges everywhere are always responsible for determining if you are compliant with their orders, and holding you accountable if not.
Not everything is appealable.
In every justice system, there is always someone who is "always right because they are last", not "last because they are always right".
For example, in the US, the supreme court judges also act as the highest individual judge in a given circuit court. This usually comes into play with stays of death penalty cases. The judges usually refer the petition to the full court, and the full court takes a vote. However, this is not required. The judge could simply deny/accept it. You would have no way to appeal this.