Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you are thinking about section 230 it only applies to user–generated content, so not server–side AI or timeline algorithms.


So if a social network tool does the exact same thing, but uses the user's own GPU or NPU to generate the content instead, suddenly it's fine?


If a user generates child porn on their own and uploads it to a social network, the social network is shielded from liability until they refuse to delete it.


Changes who's technically the perp. Offer managed porn generation service -> service provider is responsible for generating porn, like, literally literally




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: