This is pointless discussion as Go has all of these things already implemented, ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

gethly 7 months ago | parent | context | favorite | on: Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

This is pointless discussion as Go has all of these things already implemented, so there is no point in going backwards.

exceptione 7 months ago [–]

The point is that a (new) syntax for any language needs to support any such implementation. The language implementation itself is not the point.

gethly 7 months ago | [–]

Yes, and I am saying Go has already solved all of this and it makes little sense to deviate too much from its syntax.

Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact