Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I assume because Tesla, via Musk 's public proclamations kept claiming full self driving was just around the corner?

If you're assertion is that the FTC should be much more sceptical of claims by corporations, then you have a point.



It's not like they weren't told multiple times to look into it. Lina Khan confirmed it was on their radar. She's one of the most pro consumer chairs we've had. She had 4 years to make a move if she thought a lawsuit was appropriate.

https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2021.08.18%2...

https://progresschamber.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/AV_-F...

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-...

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116199/documents/... page 40,41.


Yes — that’s one plausible explanation, and it still fits the same structural question.

Whether the delay came from optimistic expectations about imminent progress, political or economic incentives, or simple regulatory inertia, the core issue remains the same: the terminology was tolerated for a long period, and that tolerance allowed ambiguity to accumulate.

My point isn’t about defending Tesla or trusting regulators’ judgment — it’s about asking why the shift happened only after years of implicit acceptance, and what effects that delay had on public understanding and responsibility.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: