Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not troubled by porn or my kids seeing it. If anything, I advocate healthy sex lives for my kids once they are of age because there is some kind of massive Puritanism push going on that looks to be the end of the human race--look how they are destroying the common bonds of love and intimacy using technology to demolish our ability to relate to one another. Don't think it's happening? Look around you--people are more and more isolated and miserable and fearful of making contact, especially intimate contact, for fear of accusations of r-a-p-e or assault or whatever. Of course I don't want predators finding my kids online and using the Internet to get to them, but that's where actual parenting comes in--teaching kids what to watch out for and to make smart choices. It's just that I don't believe we can bubble wrap everything and still have a functioning civilization on the other end. It will fail and fall down, all due to good intentions.


We are in agreement.

I'm arguing this isn't about "scummy porn". It's about censorship in general, but when it's about porn it's about all sorts of porn or sexy/naughty content. And it's wrong to want to restrict access to that.

What's wrong with sexy? Everyone seems afraid to even talk about it. It's safer to talk about other things like free speech.

But it's ok to watch porn made legally between consenting adults. And as for teens watching it, most of us old enough had access to naughty magazines back then, and it didn't mess us up.

The moral panic is unwarranted is my point.


If you are equating Pornhub to finding your dad's dirty magazine stash, you are being disingenuous.


Why? What's the difference?

I mean, there was plenty of explicit sex in those magazines.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: