> Many people actually are becoming more productive. I know you're using quotes around productive to insulate yourself from the indignity of admitting that AI actually is useful in specific domains.
Equally, my read is you're fixating on the syntax used in their comment to insulate yourself from actually engaging with their idea and point. You refuse to try to understand the parts of the system that negate the surface level popularity, eer productivity gains.
People who enjoy the productivity boost of AI are right, you can absolutely, without question build a house faster with AI.
The people who claim there's not really any reasonable productivity gains from AI are also right, because using AI to build a multistory anything, requires you to waste all that time starting with a house, to then raze it to the ground and rebuild a usable foundation.
yes, "but its useful in specific domains" is technically correct statement, but whataboutism is rarely a useful conversational response.
Equally, my read is you're fixating on the syntax used in their comment to insulate yourself from actually engaging with their idea and point. You refuse to try to understand the parts of the system that negate the surface level popularity, eer productivity gains.
People who enjoy the productivity boost of AI are right, you can absolutely, without question build a house faster with AI.
The people who claim there's not really any reasonable productivity gains from AI are also right, because using AI to build a multistory anything, requires you to waste all that time starting with a house, to then raze it to the ground and rebuild a usable foundation.
yes, "but its useful in specific domains" is technically correct statement, but whataboutism is rarely a useful conversational response.