I don't think dividing opinions into conspiracist and not conspiracist is not a ...

		TeeMassive 3 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: What happened with the CIA and The Paris Review? I don't think dividing opinions into conspiracist and not conspiracist is not a good epistemological basis. Opinions can be judged on the facts they are based on facts and how they are based on logical arguments or not regardless of their conspiracistness.