I am saying consciousness is the vibrational purturbation of our life’s medium (microtubules?) I am advocating that we may use this quantum domain as a holographic sieve. One might call that hologram “quaila” or merely the subject of thought. Our mind has not one or two, rather two billion fragments which combine or separate, process or rest relentlessly as we cope with our priorities.
I do not suggest consciousness emerged from life, I suggest life is a technology which emerged from the potential of consciousness trapped within existential being.
This magical dust, when animated by circumstance of “life”, does introspect and actualize inner worlds upon the outer. Our line is merely the most advanced we recognize.
Nemo saltat sobrius… nobody dances sober
nisi forte insanit… unless he is insane
Your user name, HN join date, and comment history (largely flagged) are intriguing to me. Do you have any longer form version of your ideas publicly available?
I share my normal as of you congenial side to acrue karma, so that I may burn it saying truthful things the mind coddled intelligentsia do not want to hear.
For me, these are the hare.
I will message something from your profile. Thanks for taking an interest in the greatest estrangement of our humanity.
I have had a hand full of former HN accounts. Some search condition (“thought control”) may reveal them all.
I can chime in to say: the scientific method, so far, cannot explain consciousness, and that the whole materialistic basis for physics is facing a crisis in the face of quantum mechanics, etc. Most of us have utmost confidence in a method that so far has nothing to say whatsoever about the most important quality of our existence: that we are aware.
The "scientific method" doesn't explain anything. It's a method for evaluating claims people make.
The fact that there is no scientifically verifiable theory of consciousness has no bearing on the science that helped people create, say, my computer monitor.
the semantics aren't very important to my argument, which is basically: our instruments can't perceive all of reality, thus we can't test theories around the unknown phenomena therein.
