There are broad differences of opinion about the validity of BAU projections a few decades out, AMOC collapse, etc.
But the climate denialists like the author don't talk about that. They attack settled science and handwave away legitimate, serious concerns by saying that risk is incalculable.
But the climate denialists like the author don't talk about that. They attack settled science and handwave away legitimate, serious concerns by saying that risk is incalculable.