It’s hard to say what Harris would have done, but it’s unlikely she would have greenlit the complete demolition of Gaza so she could build a resort.
Similarly, I doubt she would have forced places like UC Berkeley to send her lists of people critical of Israel (like you), then opened critical investigations against them.
Refusing to vote is the best way to ensure policies you object to the most are expanded.
I don't really understand this perspective. Obviously the consensus position across both parties has been to support Israel more. This is a bit murky with the (for lack of a better term) Nazi elements of maga, but GOP still claims to want to arm them more.
I don't vote for Zionists or genocide. It really is pretty simple. I also am unwilling to build my comfort on the backs of mass murder. In many ways it's better to have Trump so we can feel one tiny bit of the pain we're inflicting on others. We need drastic change and at some point the dam is going to break.
I think on foreign policy, the two candidates weren't that far apart, (although I would suspect the winds would have shifted quickly under Kamala) Importantly, as someone pointed above that the difference is in the domestic agenda where Israel is used as an excuse for to crack down on institutions and dissent.
It’s hard to say what Harris would have done, but it’s unlikely she would have greenlit the complete demolition of Gaza so she could build a resort.
Similarly, I doubt she would have forced places like UC Berkeley to send her lists of people critical of Israel (like you), then opened critical investigations against them.
Refusing to vote is the best way to ensure policies you object to the most are expanded.