Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is how I understand it as well. There was a case of a monkey taking a selfie and the photog attempting to assert copyright. Courts determined (if I remember correctly :p ) that only human works are copyrightable and therefore the monkey's selfie could not be copyrighted at all.


I deleted a whole paragraph with exactly that example, so at least if we're wrong, we're wrong together.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: