This is the kinda of thing that was preventing me from seriously considering Tesla. I accept that there is a lot more tech involved so some updates are necessary, but turning cars into cells on wheels made everyone way too eager to not ship finished product.
>> but turning cars into cells on wheels made everyone way too eager to not ship finished product.
I knew a former manager of OTA (over the air updates) at one manufacturer. I said that needed to be used for emergency updates only and not so people could be late with features or QA. She totally agreed and said it was becoming a battle with all the software teams thinking it meant they could be late and it'd be OK. They think it makes the deadline fuzzy or non-existant.
I looked at a company that did this stuff with a box that could remotely power up/down and unlock / lock a vehicle. They never even thought to check whether the vehicle was in motion or not, that's how confident they were that they'd never ever make a mistake.
If there's one device/product in my life that I do not want to have reliant on CI/CD, that I want delivered to me in a fully finished and ready to go condition where I can trust that absent material breakdown will stay exactly the same, it's my car.
Update your apps all you want. Change the layout. Betray your users and sell their data to AI, whatever, the consequences are on you.
Update my car, change its performance or range or the layouts of the buttons in the infotainment system so that I might be distracted or expecting an outcome that is suddenly no longer possible and I or the people I injure in the accident have to live with the consequences for the rest of our lives.
