Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure, in a single person household with only a smart tv and laptop. Which is not the average person.


I disagree. I would argue that most people just don’t produce enough data to have a huge need for faster uploads. You would have to produce more than 200 gigabytes of data per day before your backups would take longer than a day to finish:

    $ units 20Mbps*24hrs gigabytes
            * 216
If you’re an entertainer then you might record more than 200GB of raw video per day, but most people aren’t. You wouldn’t even need a faster connection to _become_ an entertainer, even if you soon wanted one. You could stream 4K video of your antics all day and it would be less than 200GB.

And remember that the definition is about the _minimum_ bandwidth necessary to participate in society, not what you need to be at the peak of your entertainment career. People who do need higher speeds can and will pay extra for them; the FCC definition is not about limiting what products are available. It doesn’t even require anyone to have 100×20Mbps service. The FCC is just trying to get us to a point where we can say that 100% of Americans have _access_ to that level of service, even if they have _subscribed_ to a lower level of service to save money. Since 45 million Americans don’t even have access to 100×20Mbps service we’re still pretty far away from that.


> Sure, in a single person household with only a smart tv and laptop. Which is not the average person.

What is the average person/household? How many devices? What use cases (and therefore bandwidth) meet their needs?


Average household is a family, who arent streaming 4k video or uploading huge backups like i do, and 20Mbps would be fine for me. They typically watch netflix and youtube and doomscroll.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: