(The article talks almost entirely about steel (vs. iron), but is too detail-fuzzed to trust that.)
I made very charitable assumption from this:
> Ultimately, the company hopes to license its technology to steelmakers.
Actual steelmakers know all the myriad costs and details and steps required to make steel - and would probably prefer that any radical new process replace as many of those step and details as possible, at an economic cost.
(The article talks almost entirely about steel (vs. iron), but is too detail-fuzzed to trust that.)
I made very charitable assumption from this:
> Ultimately, the company hopes to license its technology to steelmakers.
Actual steelmakers know all the myriad costs and details and steps required to make steel - and would probably prefer that any radical new process replace as many of those step and details as possible, at an economic cost.