> Do we assume a spherical bounds and just eat the cost? We pick the bounding vo... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		bob1029 6 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: A fast 3D collision detection algorithm > Do we assume a spherical bounds and just eat the cost? We pick the bounding volume that is most suitable to the use case. The cost of non-spherical bounding volumes is often not that severe when compared to purely spherical ones. https://docs.bepuphysics.com/PerformanceTips.html#shape-opti... Edit: I just noticed the doc references this issue: https://github.com/bepu/bepuphysics2/issues/63 Seems related to the article.

reactordev 6 months ago [–]

Yeah triangle-triangle is really dependent on number of triangles.

I noticed that issue is 6 years old, what’s the current state?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact