If they found that there was patent exhaustion, Apple could not have been guilty... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		cube13 on Aug 26, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Jury in Apple v. Samsung Goofed, Damages Reduced; ... If they found that there was patent exhaustion, Apple could not have been guilty of infringing on the patents. The exhaustion doctrine is pretty clear on this.

VanL on Aug 26, 2012 [–]

Patent exhaustion is about liability for infringement, not infringement itself.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact