Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is a misleading, half backed, and click bait "finding".

They didn't even identify if problem is the glass or stuff like pains around the glass.



The paper mentions in multiple places, including the abstract, that the cause of higher microplastics readings was likely from the bottle caps, given that the found microplastics matched the color and composition of the paint on the bottle caps.


They absolutely did identify it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: