Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
on Aug 19, 2012
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Programming Languages Have Social Mores Not Idioms
[deleted]
zedshaw
on Aug 19, 2012
|
next
[–]
I am the author of a notable amount of Ruby code. Also, for loops are syntactic sugar for .each in Ruby, so maybe you should go learn Ruby?
Tichy
on Aug 19, 2012
|
parent
|
next
[–]
Oh, it's you - I'll take your word for it (seriously). I guess I haven't ever really used for in with Ruby, thought about other languages.
pjonesdotca
on Aug 19, 2012
|
parent
|
prev
|
next
[–]
An unsurprising response.
jamesbritt
on Aug 19, 2012
|
prev
[–]
I'm pretty sure Zed knows Ruby quite well.
FWIW, `for .. in` is syntactic sugar over `each`
kenko
on Aug 19, 2012
|
parent
|
next
[–]
So in order to each `for ... in`, should you have to teach Enumerable, etc?
Apocryphon
on Aug 19, 2012
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
He also knows the community quite well, as well.
jamesbritt
on Aug 19, 2012
|
root
|
parent
[–]
Well, there is no monolithic Ruby community.
There are many.
Some are bigger/louder than others.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: