We have no information on that one way or the other.
> a slightly more secure text messaging replacement
Yea but it wasn't secure at all. For any purpose.
> that weren’t subject to the same security requirements as the Secretary of Defense?
Regardless of who is using it and for what purpose I'd like the server to actually be secure.
This isn't a left vs. right issue. This is an overall government incompetence issue.
We have no information on that one way or the other.
> a slightly more secure text messaging replacement
Yea but it wasn't secure at all. For any purpose.
> that weren’t subject to the same security requirements as the Secretary of Defense?
Regardless of who is using it and for what purpose I'd like the server to actually be secure.
This isn't a left vs. right issue. This is an overall government incompetence issue.