Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Why not require two or three reviews if they are so helpful at finding mistakes?

Places do? a lot of opensource projects have the concept of dual reviews, and a lot of code bases have CODEOWNERS to ensure the people with the context review the code, so you could have 5-10 reviewers if you do a large PR



Does it make the code better? The best projects are the ones with the most review l?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: