Yeah the flexible shafts were terrible. I'd get highly variable movement even when making movements in only one direction (IE, home to Y 0, then only move positive ). They were so bad I tried to find ways to mount the steppers directly on each axis, which means the Y stepper is hanging out in air putting a lot of weight directly on the Y stage.
Instead, i switched to cloning stages like this: https://www.asiimaging.com/products/stages/xy-inverted-stage... but I used off-the-shelf (well, amazon) linear rails, off-the-shelf (stepperonline) steppers, and 3d printed (or machined aluminum) frames. Works much better.
For those interested, there is also OpenUC2 on this niche: https://github.com/openUC2/UC2-GIT
It would be interesting to see how the two systems compare.
TRIZ says to solve it with ablateable materials- thin foilsheets with a evaporating binding agent - there are uv-resistant plastics https://topas.com/uv-transparency/ even transparent ones, but they are not printable.
It’s for teachers and their students, so presumably they don’t need it anymore after the class experiment is over and durability isn’t a concern? And they could always print it again.
A friend sent me this simple design for a raman spectrometer [1].
And some 3D-printable cage optics for when alignment is really important [2].
[1]: https://hackteria.org/wiki/images/a/a0/MobPhone_RamanSpec_20...
[2]: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246806721...