Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I really can't with these paper titles anymore, man.


There's an Ask HN thread going[1] asking about what people have done with small LLMs. This seems like a possible application. I asked Granite 3.1 MOE 3B to generate a title based on the abstract and it came up with:

Tensor Product Attention: A Memory-Efficient Solution for Longer Input Sequences in Language Models

Maybe a Greasemonkey script to pass arXiv abstracts to a local Ollama could be something...

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42784365


Clickbait paper titles considered harmful?


Clickbait paper titles cause cancer, study shows


Clickbait paper titles cure cancer (if you print them out, set them on fire, and incinerate the cancer cells*)

*side effects TBD


in mice


OK I'll admit I chuckled


Only if the paper is handwritten.


By 2038 all scientific papers will be titled 'Bruh.' While this might at first seem a recipe for confusion, the fundamental interconnectedness of all things as demonstrated by Ollama(Googol 13) highlight the fact that pretty much any insight is as good as any other and are all descriptions of the same underlying phenomenon. Freed from constraint like survival or the necessity to engage in economic activity, humanity in the 203s will mainly devote itself to contemplating amusing but fundamentally interchangeable perspectives within increasingly comfy pleasure cubes.


As foretold by Joseph Campbell


Bruh is all you need


I hate how paper titles are worded like seo techniques.


Turn something into a metric and it will be misused. Ever always was


Attention is all you need!


138,000 papers are "X is all you need", now 138,001

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ro&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22i...


640 if you use intitle, exclude citations, and filter to 2017 onwards


The attention economy and its consequences.


Unexpected Kaczynski.


> Ever always was

Always has been.

silent gunshot


This is a riff on the original "attention is all you need" paper, there has been a few of these lately


A few? A multitude.


This one might be right if they have in fact unified multiple attention approaches into a single framework

see Section 3.4


Having a catchy title is great for short hand. If it didn’t have such a catchy name I probably wouldn’t remember Flush+Reload, Spectre, or even Attention is All You Need


On the one hand, sure, it's dumb.

But, on the other hand, it's hard to get researchers to read your paper, esp. in fast-moving areas. Every little thing might be the difference between reading the abstract or not. Reading the abstract might lead to reading the intro. And so on.

So, for better or worse, the competition for human eyeballs is real.

Ironically, in this case, "attention" is all that the authors want.


Preach, mate. The bloody Beatles and their bloody catchy refrains and hit songs. They sing “Love is all you need” once, and now it’s everywhere! Can’t hide from it. Even scientific papers! Especially scientific papers!

Bloody hell and brimstone. Been crazy 57 years and a half already.


And they don't formally show that the titles are correct, therefore I don't think these papers belong in CS.


And I can't with the constant off-topic meta-discussions about the titles of papers.


Same. At this point “All we need” is about a thousand different things..


A catchy title is all you need (to get attention).


All you need is love.


haha same




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: