Suppose insurance company doctors could lose their medical license if too many of their decisions are reversed in court. I imagine these doctors would command higher pay for their increased level of personal risk, but would end up making better choices for the insured. What does HN think?
What about if we instead of building more levels on top of this already falling building we build a new one a few blocks over. With blackjack, hookers, and free* and humane health care.
* not really free of course, but you pay less on average than you do today and you do it on your taxes instead of to some profit chasing private company -- and most importantly those who don't pay today will have equal access to it as well.