Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I read the article again, what am I missing? I'm sorry, I know I must be skipping over something somehow but I don't know what!


That's my reading of the following:

A case before the High Court (roughly analogous to the US Supreme Court) determined that images produced in a video game were the property of the game developer, not the player -- even though the player manipulated the game to produce a unique arrangement of game assets on the screen.


Ah—I wonder if that would really apply to something like Minecraft though.

See, I do agree with the court if you're playing through a linear game like Portal or Uncharted. Yes, technically the exact frames are unique to your playthrough, but the creativity came from the game developer.

Minecraft is something very different.


I think this comes down to the point of the article: the whole question is an undecided legal minefield.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: