I don't think you're off base by saying that people have a level of social responsibility to the people they live around. I think that can be argued perfectly logically.
What I'm not sure I agree with is that it translates to a responsibility to stay. Isn't someone who emigrates permanently away from their local community breaking the same social contract as someone who chooses medically assisted dying? Should that be prevented for the same reasons?
I can see the position that MAID is genuinely abdicating a true responsibility in some extreme cases, like a parent with minor children.
If there exists a social responsibility then there exists a responsibility to stay. Emigration could very well be abdicating social responsibility, but not irrevocably so, and in the modern world much of your responsibility to those you left behind is still fillable even after emigrating. Dying is irrevocable and puts you entirely out of reach.
What I'm not sure I agree with is that it translates to a responsibility to stay. Isn't someone who emigrates permanently away from their local community breaking the same social contract as someone who chooses medically assisted dying? Should that be prevented for the same reasons?
I can see the position that MAID is genuinely abdicating a true responsibility in some extreme cases, like a parent with minor children.