Same! This topic gets me soo irritated. If someone is supposed an expert in a field (hence them being an interviewer) how can an average joe fool them into thinking they know more than they actually do during a conversation?
Even now with LLMs generating almost real time, there is always a slight delay and we all know that LLMs are far from perfect.
It seems the tech community on one hand complains at how bad LLMs are for doing deep tech while at the same time fears them as they can make any candidate pass interviews. So which one is it?
Also, the simplest trick even old-timers professor already know:
Not all interviewers are experts. If you are building out your business you will be hiring roles that don't exist yet. Of course that brings different requirements for that first hire, but judging their skill level might prove very hard.
Even now with LLMs generating almost real time, there is always a slight delay and we all know that LLMs are far from perfect.
It seems the tech community on one hand complains at how bad LLMs are for doing deep tech while at the same time fears them as they can make any candidate pass interviews. So which one is it?
Also, the simplest trick even old-timers professor already know:
1) Prepare an open ended question about X
2) Ask it to ChatGPT, Claude, etc.
3) Take note of the titles, keywords used, etc.
4) Ask it to the candidate
5) Compare responses