Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Hard agree (with you, that is).

It's just another case of people confusing "What I personally want" with "What actually leads to a sustainable business/ecosystem".

I honestly think people get confused about this because we are so accustomed to getting what we want.



What I want is incompatible with a lot of businesses sustaining themselves. That doesn't change anything in how I think regulation or technology should work here. I think we should have both technological change and regulatory change in the online ad industry that would wipe out a large chunk of the ecosystem.


In economics, the phrase "what the market will bear " often comes up. Consumers will block obnoxious ads up to what companies will bear.


There's no "right to have a sustainable business", sorry.


I honestly do not understand this point. If they offer me a 50/year sub that is not sustainable without extra ads then adjust the fucking price.

Set a price to make it sustainable.

Offer a 50/year plan with limited ads and a 200/year with no ads and be upfront about why those are the costs.

It’s not rocket science.


The customer is always right.


"The customer" as a broad concept is perfectly fine with advertising, which would make you wrong.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: