Interesting that they would act this hostile towards ATT. AT&T would surely be a major potential customer for Broadcom's network chips (either directly or through someone like Arista that builds products with them).
The value of that business from an ISP has to be much much higher than a support contract for servers. Even if they don't use Broadcom for networking today, why put any more strategic business at risk over something like this?
The value of that business from an ISP has to be much much higher than a support contract for servers. Even if they don't use Broadcom for networking today, why put any more strategic business at risk over something like this?