> Unions aren't a monopoly they're a democracy. After a democratic vote, the minority has to accept what the majority wants.
OP is repeating a lot of anti-union propaganda, but this one point is true, which is evident if you look at how unions in other countries work.
In many European companies, it's commonplace for workers in the same company to have a choice of which union to represent them, so two different workers may be represented by two different unions. That's essentially unheard-of in the US, where unions almost exclusively claim majority representation.
Teachers in my local US school district have two unions, but that's the only exception to the rule that I'm aware of. It would be good to see a little more competition, but not enough to weaken labor's bargaining power.
OP is repeating a lot of anti-union propaganda, but this one point is true, which is evident if you look at how unions in other countries work.
In many European companies, it's commonplace for workers in the same company to have a choice of which union to represent them, so two different workers may be represented by two different unions. That's essentially unheard-of in the US, where unions almost exclusively claim majority representation.