I...don't really understand what the purpose of any of this would be? How are wearables "integrated with daily life" for most people right now? And to the extent that they are for a particular subset of adults...why is this something that we should allow, expect and not even try to stop children from doing?
I get the impression that the logic you are following here could be more accurately described as "we should never ban any tech ever for anyone because it MIGHT in the future became important for most people's daily lives...assuming we didn't ban it". It seems like a circular argument to me and doesn't make any argument whatsoever about whether or not said devices SHOULD become part of children's (and adults) daily lives.
> as our devices become increasingly wearable and integrated with daily life
This is a forward looking statement. The point is that the integration of wearables is just beginning. Banning them might work for now, but assuming the integration continues and increases, banning them might not be viable in the future.
Imagine a scenario where an Apple Watch is also monitoring blood glucose. Or where someone's prescription eyeglasses are also connected to the Internet. These are things that are already happening today, but haven't yet permeated society.
Another 10, 20, 30 years of progress will bring new issues and consumer expectations that may make bans less viable. The point of all of this is to think about potential ways to navigate such a future.
I get the impression that the logic you are following here could be more accurately described as "we should never ban any tech ever for anyone because it MIGHT in the future became important for most people's daily lives...assuming we didn't ban it". It seems like a circular argument to me and doesn't make any argument whatsoever about whether or not said devices SHOULD become part of children's (and adults) daily lives.