> Cosmology rests on the principal that physics is the same in all directions, over all translations, and over time translation.
That the laws of physics are the same. That doesn't mean the geometry of spacetime is the same or that the configuration of matter and energy is the same.
> There are a variety of papers exploring the topic of how much these assumptions would need to be violated to mirror observations.
What papers? Do you have any references?
> A good example being
what if the electron was more massive in the past?
That the laws of physics are the same. That doesn't mean the geometry of spacetime is the same or that the configuration of matter and energy is the same.
> There are a variety of papers exploring the topic of how much these assumptions would need to be violated to mirror observations.
What papers? Do you have any references?
> A good example being
what if the electron was more massive in the past?
All Redshift would then be explained away ;)
What is your basis for this extraordinary claim?