> I read GP's post to mean that if you take a step back, Windows' history of (in)security is what has led us to an environment where CrowdStrike is used / needed.
Windows does have a history of insecurity, but it is no different from any other software in this regard. The environment would be the same in the absence of Windows.
Attacks are developed for Windows because attacks against Windows are more valuable -- they have a large number of potential targets -- not because they're easier to develop.
Windows does have a history of insecurity, but it is no different from any other software in this regard. The environment would be the same in the absence of Windows.
Attacks are developed for Windows because attacks against Windows are more valuable -- they have a large number of potential targets -- not because they're easier to develop.