Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> If you ever read an article on a subject with which you have a lot of first-hand experience, you’ll notice that they always get major things wrong – basic facts, dates, names of people and organizations, the stated intentions of involved parties, the reasons a thing is happening – things even a novice in the space would know better about.

No, not always.



Can you offer a counterexample?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: