Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, maybe the database should have more suitable defaults? Arguably, slowing down a bit once when the WAL grows beyond X MB to clean it up is better behavior than having it grow unboundedly, but maybe that's not possible.


There is no one-size-fits-all solution in the SQL world, and using SQLite in such a scenario is not a good idea. SQLite is an embedded database for embedded use. Even PostgreSQL is not universal, as many people assume. For use cases like analytics, there are many better-suited database engines.


Sure, but there are one-size-fits-95% solutions, and they're better than one-size-fits-90% solutions.


Absolutely agree. As most projects are small or medium in size, PostgreSQL is a good default choice. Problems arise when the problem does not fit the solution or tool. For example, using SQLite for high-volume transactions and then complaining that it doesn't work.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: