Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

“Against the public interest” might contain a clue for the distinction they’re making.


It's not as silly for cable lobbyists to want something they shouldn't have as it is to have people on the gov payroll attempt to write it into law. Even more silly is for journalists to not name the offenders. Those evil cable lobbyists did this!


"Against the public interest" is the vaguest bar for investigation I can imagine, it's even vaguer than "probable cause" in policing! As long as you can find a person who disagrees (and presumably pays taxes), you're good to go on "against the public interest"?


K, so let's give it a try anyway and see what kind of behavior it incentivizes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: